
Backblaze has recorded and saved daily hard drive statistics from the drives in our data centers since April 2013. At the end of 2016 we had 73,653 spinning hard drives. Of that number, there were 1,553 boot drives and 72,100 data drives. This post looks at the hard drive statistics of the data drives we monitor. We’ll first look at the stats for Q4 2016, then present the data for all of 2016, and finish with the lifetime statistics for all of the drives Backblaze has used in our cloud storage data centers since we started keeping track. Along the way we’ll share observations and insights on the data presented. As always you can download our Hard Drive Test Data to examine and use.
Hard Drive Reliability Statistics for Q4 2016
At the end of Q4 2016 Backblaze was monitoring 72,100 data drives. For our evaluation we remove from consideration those drives which were used for testing purposes and those drive models for which we did not have at least 45 drives. This leaves us with 71,939 production hard drives. The table below is for the period of Q4 2016.
- The failure rate listed is for just Q4 2016. If a drive model has a failure rate of 0%, it means there were no drive failures of that model during that quarter.
- 90 drives (2 storage pods) were used for testing purposes during the period. They contained Seagate 1.5TB and 1.0 TB WDC drives. These are not included in the results above.
- The most common reason we have less than 45 drives of one model is that we needed to replace a failed drive, but that drive model is no longer available. We use 45 drives as the minimum number to report quarterly and yearly statistics.
8 TB Hard Drive Performance
In Q4 2016 we introduced a third 8 TB drive model, the Seagate ST8000NM0055. This is an enterprise class drive. One 60-drive Storage Pod was deployed mid-Q4 and the initial results look promising as there have been no failures to date. Given our past disdain for overpaying for enterprise drives, it will be interesting to see how these drives perform.
We added 3,540 Seagate 8 TB drives, model ST8000DM002, giving us 8,660 of these drives. That’s 69 petabytes of raw storage, before formatting and encoding, or about 22% of our current data storage capacity. The failure rate for the quarter of these 8 TB drives was a very respectable 1.65%. That’s lower than the Q4 failure rate of 1.94% for all of the hard drives in the table above.
During the next couple of calendar quarters we’ll monitor how the new enterprise 8 TB drives compare to the consumer 8 TB drives. We’re interested to know which models deliver the best value and we bet you are too. We’ll let you know what we find.
2016 Hard Drive Performance Statistics
Looking back over 2016, we added 15,646 hard drives, and migrated 110 Storage Pods (4,950 drives) from 1-, 1.5-, and 2 TB drives to 4-, 6- and 8 TB drives. Below are the hard drive failure stats for 2016. As with the quarterly results, we have removed any non-production drives and any models that had less than 45 drives.
In 2016, three drives models ended the year with zero failures, albeit with a small number of drives. Both the 4 TB Toshiba and the 8 TB HGST models went the entire year without a drive failure. The 8 TB Seagate (ST8000NM0055) drives, which were deployed in November 2016, also recorded no failures.
The total number of failed drives was 1,225 for the year. That’s 3.36 drive failures per day or about 5 drives per workday, a very manageable workload. Of course, that’s easy for me to say, since I am not the one swapping out drives.
The overall hard drive failure rate for 2016 was 1.95%. That’s down from 2.47% in 2015 and well below the 6.39% failure rate for 2014.
Big Drives Rule
We increased storage density by moving to higher-capacity drives. That helped us end 2016 with 3 TB drives being the smallest density drives in our data centers. During 2017, we will begin migrating from the 3.0 TB drives to larger-sized drives. Here’s the distribution of our hard drives in our data centers by size for 2016.

Digging in a little further, below are the failure rates by drive size and vendor for 2016.
Computing the Failure Rate
Failure Rate, in the context we use it, is more accurately described as the Annualized Failure Rate. It is computed based on Drive Days and Drive Failures, not on the Drive Count. This may seem odd given we are looking at a one year period, 2016 in this case, so let’s take a look.
We start by dividing the Drive Failures by the Drive Count. For example if we use the statistics for 4 TB files, we get a “failure rate” of 1.92%, but the annualized failure rate shown on the chart for 4 TB drives is 2.06%. The trouble with just dividing Drive Failures by Drive Count is that the Drive Count constantly changes over the course of the year. By using Drive Count from a given day, you assume that each drive contributed the same amount of time over the year, but that’s not the case. Drives enter and leave the system all the time. By counting the number of days each drive is active as Drive Days, we can account for all the ins and outs over a given period of time.
Hard Drive Benchmark Statistics
As we noted earlier, we’ve been collecting and storing drive stats data since April 2013. In that time we have used 55 different hard drive models in our data center for data storage. We’ve omitted models from the table below that we didn’t have enough of to populate an entire storage pod (45 or fewer). That excludes 25 of those 55 models.
Fun with Numbers
Since April 2013, there have been 5,380 hard drives failures. That works out to about 5 per day or about 7 per workday (200 workdays per year). As a point of reference, Backblaze only had 4,500 total hard drives in June 2010 when we racked our 100th Storage Pod to support our cloud backup service.
The 58,375,646 Drive Days translates to a little over 1.4 Billion Drive Hours. Going the other way we are measuring a mere 159,933 years of spinning hard drives.
You’ll also notice that we have used a total of 85,467 hard drives. But at the end of 2016 we had 71,939 hard drives. Are we missing 13,528 hard drives? Not really. While some drives failed, the remaining drives were removed from service due primarily to migrations from smaller to larger drives. The stats from the “migrated” drives, like Drive Hours, still count in establishing a failure rate, but they did not fail, they just stopped reporting data.
Failure Rates Over Time
The chart below shows the annualized failure rates of hard drives by drive size over time. The data points are the rates as of the end of each year shown. The “stars” mark the average annualized failure rate for all of the hard drives for each year.
Notes:
- The “8.0TB” failure rate of 4.9% for 2015 is comprised of 45 drives of which there were 2 failures during that year. In 2016 the number of 8 TB drives rose to 8,765 with 48 failures and an annualized failure rate of 1.6%.
- The “1.0TB” drives were 5+ years old on average when they were retired.
- There are only 45 of the “5.0TB” drives in operation.
Can’t Get Enough Hard Drive Stats?
We’ll be presenting the webinar “Backblaze Hard Drive Stats for 2016” on Thursday February 2, 2017 at 10:00 Pacific time. The webinar will be recorded so you can watch it over and over again. The webinar will dig deeper into the quarterly, yearly, and lifetime hard drive stats and include the annual and lifetime stats by drive size and manufacturer. You will need to subscribe to the Backblaze BrightTALK channel to view the webinar. Sign up for the webinar today.
As a reminder, the complete data set used to create the information used in this review is available on our Hard Drive Test Data page. You can download and use this data for free for your own purpose, all we ask is three things 1) you cite Backblaze as the source if you use the data, 2) you accept that you are solely responsible for how you use the data, and 3) you do not sell this data to anyone, it is free. If you just want the summarized data used to create the tables and charts in this blog post you can download the ZIP file containing the MS Excel spreadsheet.
Good luck and let us know if you find anything interesting.







Pingback: 2016 Hard Drive Reliabilty Benchmark Stats – g33kymom()
Pingback: Taux de panne des disques durs mécaniques – 2016 | MacFay Hardware()
Pingback: February 5, 2017 – Stuff I Found Interesting – Musing Codger()
Pingback: Transparency in Business: Why It Matters and How It Can Benefit You()
Pingback: 2017 Hard Drive Reliability by Drive Size and Brand()
Pingback: The best NAS hard drive - practical experience and objective data()
Pingback: Best Online Backup for Enterprise 2017()
Pingback: World Backup Day - Websmyth()
Pingback: 2017 Hard Drive Reliability By Manufacturer and Model()
Pingback: 10 of the most affordable and reliable external hard drives of 2017()
Pingback: 10 of the most affordable and reliable external hard drives of 2017 – CHB Blog()
Pingback: 10 of the most affordable and reliable external hard drives of 2017 – Castwb()
Pingback: 10 of the most affordable and reliable external hard drives of 2017 – ABC Content Board()
Pingback: 10 of the most affordable and reliable external hard drives of 2017 |()
Pingback: 10 of the most affordable and reliable external hard drives of 2017 - I C E Z O N E()
Pingback: 10 of the most affordable and reliable external hard drives of 2017 – 24 365 News()
Pingback: Die beste NAS Festplatte - NAS Selber Bauen()
Pingback: The death of a hard drive, and eBay shopping… | Hypn.za.net()
Pingback: What is RAID? A Practical Guide to Definitions, Use and Costs – Cloudwards – Raid recovery()
Pingback: What is RAID? A Practical Guide to Definitions, Use and Costs()
Pingback: Backblaze Backup Survey Results - Gestalt IT()
Pingback: ¿Cuál es el mejor disco duro interno? ¿Cuál es la marca de discos duros más fiable en 2017?()
Pingback: ストレージ業者のBackblazeがメーカー別HDD故障率2016年版と2013-2016年累積版を発表へ。HGST、東芝、WDC、Seagateなどを比較。おすすめはやっはりHGST?()
Pingback: Hard Drive Stats for Q1 2017 – Akshaya IT Services()
Pingback: 2017 Hard Drive Failure Rates - What the Numbers Tell Us()
Pingback: Какой жёсткий диск надёжнее? О железе nas4free на Q2 2017 — ProgrSite()
Pingback: 自宅用NASの選定 | たけらぼ()
Pingback: 自宅用NASの選定 | たけらぼ()
Pingback: Photo Funnels: How a Professional Organizer Manages All Her Photographs | Vincent's Reviews()
Pingback: Steel To Tin: The First 10 Years of Backblaze – Akshaya IT Services()
Pingback: Turning Steel Into Tin: The First 10 Years of Backblaze()
Pingback: The Hard Drives Most (and Least) Likely to Fail, According to Backblaze – Weston Tech()
Pingback: Taux de pannes des disques durs – infoordi()
Pingback: Review - HD 2Tb Toshiba P300 Alta Performance + Dicas Entre Qual Marca Comprar Toshiba ou HGST? - TI Express()
Pingback: Les disques durs les plus fiables - Ineï - Agence web & SSII()
Pingback: オーディ用の外付けHDDやNASに最適なハードディスクは?(2017年2月時点)()
Pingback: 外付けHDDやNASに最適なハードディスクは?(2017年2月時点)()
Pingback: NAS harde schijven test – Shadowfax ICT()
Pingback: Quels sont les disques durs les plus fiables ? | Total Depannage()
Pingback: Best Hard Drives: Hitachi Tops The List, Toshiba Second - Study Reveals()
Pingback: Stuff The Internet Says On Scalability For February 3rd, 2017 – Insurance Up2date()
Pingback: Stuff The Internet Says On Scalability For February 3rd, 2017 – Cloud Up2date()
Pingback: Backblaze 的 2016 硬碟良率報告,HGST 果然還是不二選擇啊~ | Heresy's Space()
Pingback: HGST Deskstar NAS 3TB - Untitled()
Pingback: 如果你想买一个硬盘,你需要阅读这个 (If you want to buy a hard drive, you need to read this) | Atman翻译聚合中心()
Pingback: Backblaze 的 硬碟 選購測試經驗分享 - 2016 - Tsung's Blog()
Pingback: HDD故障率のメーカー・モデル別統計データ2016年版、故障率が最も高かったのは? | なにごとも()
Pingback: rclone ile Amazon Cloud Drive’a yedekleme()
Pingback: If you want to buy a hard drive, you need to read this – TECH BLOGS()
Pingback: If you want to buy a hard drive, you need to read this - Tech IchorTech Ichor()
Pingback: As Marcas de HDs Que Mais Deram Problemas em 2016 - Qual Você Vai Comprar? - TI Express()
Pingback: Najbardziej niezawodny dysk twardy roku 2016 - BackUp Academy()
Pingback: Sabe quais foram os melhores e os piores discos de 2016? | Repairstore Tech - Tudo sobre Tecnologia()
Pingback: If you want to buy a hard drive, you need to read this | All About Tech in News()
Pingback: Three C's to Tweet By | TechSNAP 304 | Jupiter Broadcasting()
Pingback: 2016年で故障率が低かったHDDメーカーはどこ? | News Coffee()
Pingback: cron.weekly issue #66: Git Filesystem, Security, JVM, Fission, Habitat, TLS 1.3 & more!()
Pingback: Cakera Keras Paling Boleh Dipercayai Menurut Statistik Backblaze | TechSemut Malaysia()
Pingback: Cakera Keras Paling Boleh Dipercayai Menurut Statistik Backblaze - TechKini.com()
Pingback: If you want to buy a hard drive, you need to read this()
Pingback: 2016 Hard Drive Reliabilty Benchmark Stats – All Things Technology()
Pingback: If you want to buy a hard drive, you need to read this - Sujahat Ali Khan()
Pingback: If you want to buy a hard drive, you need to read this - BADBODY Magazine()
Pingback: If you want to buy a hard drive, you need to read this – ExploreAbout.com()
Pingback: If you want to buy a hard drive, you need to read this | Azoomit()
Pingback: If you want to buy a hard drive, you need to read this | Nandex Radio()
Pingback: If you want to buy a hard drive, you need to read this - GeekList()
Pingback: If you want to buy a hard drive, you need to read this | M&C Recycle Blog()
Pingback: If you want to buy a hard drive, you need to read this | News Worldwide()
Pingback: If you want to buy a hard drive, you need to read this – Wilson's Media()
Pingback: If you want to buy a hard drive, you need to read this – DevMonkey TechBlog()
Pingback: 【IT】HDD故障率のメーカー・モデル別統計データ2016年版、故障率が最も高かったのは? | まとめックスxxxxx()
Pingback: 【IT】HDD故障率のメーカー・モデル別統計データ2016年版、故障率が最も高かったのは? | まとめ君()
Pingback: Очередной отчёт Backblaze вознёс на пьедестал надёжности диски HGST()
Pingback: HDD故障率のメーカー・モデル別統計データ2016年版、故障率が最も高かったのは? - 速報まとめヘッドライン()
Pingback: A HGST HDD-k viszik a prímet a Backblaze megbízhatsági statisztikájában – HardverDemo()
Pingback: Backblaze 對 2016 硬碟損耗狀況的分析 | Gea-Suan Lin's BLOG()
Pingback: 2016年第四季與全年度硬碟維修率統計出爐 又是個令人咋舌的精美故障率 | 3PM.hk |esport|電競|打機|遊戲|Online Game|Mobile Game()
Pingback: Сервис бэкапов назвал самые надёжные жёсткие диски 2016 года. — QWERTY.KG()
Pingback: Estes são os HDs mais confiáveis, segundo uma empresa de backup | Maranhão+()
Pingback: HDD故障率のメーカー・モデル別統計データ2016年版 | 藤沢商工会議所パソコン教室()
Pingback: HDD故障率のメーカー・モデル別統計データ2016年版 | むさし府中商工会議所パソコン教室()
Pingback: 名古屋商工会議所パソコン教室()
Pingback: HDD故障率のメーカー・モデル別統計データ2016年版、故障率が最も高かったのは?()
Pingback: The Hard Drives Most (and Least) Likely To Fail, According To Backblaze | Lifehacker Australia()
Pingback: 2016年版、HDDの故障率ランキング。1位のメーカーは… - Coffee Break()
Pingback: El disco duro que menos falla del mercado acumula 145 años de uso sin errores en un test de fiabilidad – Crónicas Venezuela()
Pingback: 【IT】HDD故障率のメーカー・モデル別統計データ2016年版、故障率が最も高かったのは? | ベアー通信()
Pingback: Discos duros vs discos SSD()
Pingback: Backblaze reveals its 2016 hard drive failure rate list - Michigan Free Listing()
Pingback: 2016年版、HDDの故障率ランキング。1位のメーカーは… | まとMETAL()
Pingback: 哪個品牌硬碟最易壞?最新專業「硬碟測試報告」來了! - New MobileLife 流動日報()
Pingback: Si vas a comprar un disco duro, atento a estos modelos: son los que más parecen fallar – Invertilo()
Pingback: Si vas a comprar un disco duro, atento a estos modelos: son los que más parecen fallar | FM Natural()
Pingback: 2016年版、HDDの故障率ランキング。1位のメーカーは… | フラッシュ速報()
Pingback: Si vas a comprar un disco duro, atento a estos modelos: son los que más parecen fallar – Radio Popular Las Varillas()
Pingback: 2016年版、HDDの故障率ランキング。1位のメーカーは…()
Pingback: Backblaze reveals its 2016 hard drive failure rate list - Dubai Mazad Blog()
Pingback: 2016年版、HDDの故障率ランキング。1位のメーカーは… | VIPエレキバン()
Pingback: Quels sont les disques durs les plus fiables ? | My Tiny Tools()
Pingback: 2016年版、HDDの故障率ランキング。1位のメーカーは… | まとめ News Paper()
Pingback: 【IT】HDD故障率のメーカー・モデル別統計データ2016年版、故障率が最も高かったのは? - ぎふはぶ()
Pingback: Backblaze reveals its 2016 hard drive failure rate list()
Pingback: HDD故障率のメーカー・モデル別統計データ2016年版、故障率が最も高かったのは? | NewsHub()
Pingback: 【IT】HDD故障率のメーカー・モデル別統計データ2016年版、故障率が最も高かったのは? | 情報センター()
Pingback: The Hard Drives Most (and Least) Likely to Fail, According to Backblaze()
Pingback: Si vas a comprar un disco duro, atento a estos modelos: son los que más parecen fallar - Noticias en RD Hoy()
Pingback: Backblaze Publikon Statistikat Mbi Dështimin e HDD-ve Për 2016 – GW Computers Blog()
Pingback: Si vas a comprar un disco duro, atento a estos modelos: son los que más parecen fallar – Radio Región()
Pingback: Dit zijn de minst betrouwbare harde schijven van 2016 - TechPulse()
Pingback: Si vas a comprar un disco duro, atento a estos modelos: son los que más parecen fallar – Radio Folclore 99.9Mhz()
Pingback: Hard disk più affidabili e quelli che si rompono: eccoli qui | NUTesla | The Informant()
Pingback: Quels sont les disques durs les plus fiables ? | MégaPassions le blog()
Pingback: Si vas a comprar un disco duro, atento a estos modelos: son los que más parecen fallar | PK Tech()
Pingback: Gli hard disk Toshiba e Hitachi non si rompono mai | PaulMag()
Pingback: „Backblaze“ paskelbė kokie kietieji diskai genda labiausiai | MiTech.lt()
Pingback: HDD故障率のメーカー・モデル別統計データ2016年版公開 – ジサクテック()
Pingback: WD vs Toshiba vs HGST vs Seagate — Which usually Hard Drives Are usually Most Reliable? | ATechpoint()
Pingback: WD vs Toshiba vs HGST vs Seagate — Which Hard Drives Are Most Reliable?()
Pingback: 2016 Hard Drive Reliabilty Benchmark Stats by Backblaze | The Linkielist()
Pingback: Si vas a comprar un disco duro, atento a estos modelos: son los que más parecen fallar – Protec Solutions()
Pingback: Si vas a comprar un disco duro, atento a estos modelos: son los que más parecen fallar | Tecno Alcance()
Pingback: Si vas a comprar un disco duro, atento a estos modelos: son los que más parecen fallar | Android 3G - ¡Estamos conectados con la Tecnología Android!.()
Pingback: Si vas a comprar un disco duro, atento a estos modelos: son los que más parecen fallar | obiKuo()
Pingback: Si vas a comprar un disco duro, atento a estos modelos: son los que más parecen fallar – La 100 Las Varillas()
Pingback: Backblaze senaraikan hard disk paling cepat rosak dan yang paling susah nak rosak 2016()
Pingback: Los discos duros que más fallan (y los que menos)()
Pingback: Backblaze's 2016 HDD Failure Stats Revealed: HGST the Most Reliable | Web21th()
Pingback: El estudio de Discos Duros de Backblaze's "2016 HDD Failure Stats" destaca a HGST como la marca más confiable - OCKD.es - Entusiastas del PC()
Pingback: The Hard Drives Most (and Least) Likely to Fail, According to Backblaze | Jamaican Moments™()
Pingback: The Hard Drives Most (and Least) Likely to Fail, According to Backblaze « Fribliss()
Pingback: 2016 Hard Drive Reliabilty Benchmark Stats | ExtendTree()
Pingback: 2016 Hard Drive Reliabilty Benchmark Stats()